You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

PACOM chief urges compromise in Asian sea dispute

Jun. 5, 2013 - 02:59PM   |  
Samuel Locklear
Adm. Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, attends a press conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, on June 5. (Vincent Thian/AP)
  • Filed Under

KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA — The U.S. will oppose moves by any country to seize control of disputed areas in the South China Sea by force, the top American military commander in the Pacific said Wednesday, adding that rival claimants might need to seek compromises to resolve the feud over potentially oil-rich territories.

Adm. Samuel Locklear, commander of U.S. Pacific Command, did not mention any country by name, but China’s increasingly aggressive claims to disputed islands have triggered worries about confrontations with others including the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei.

“We will oppose the change of status quo by force by anyone,” Locklear told reporters during a visit to Malaysia. “We need to retain the status quo until we get to a code of conduct or a solution by party nations that is peacefully accepted.”

Southeast Asian governments want a legally binding code of conduct with China to deter hostile actions and prevent fighting.

Beijing has not clearly said when it would discuss the proposal, but the acting top U.S. diplomat for East Asia, Joe Yun, said in Washington Wednesday that that there seems to be an understanding between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations to start formal negotiations on the code of conduct some time this year.

Yun said if that’s the case, the U.S. would welcome it.

Locklear said the U.S. would not take sides but added that a code of conduct that enables maritime officers “to understand the boundaries of what they can do (would be) in the best interest for a peaceful solution.”

He nevertheless said tensions were unlikely to escalate badly because the countries “understand this could be a long process, they understand restraint.”

China has sought to resolve disputes through bilateral negotiations, but some of the countries want multilateral talks, feeling Beijing’s size is too much of an advantage in direct talks.

“It seems to me that when you have a collective perspective, it is more viable in the long run,” Locklear said. “You can’t get through a complex situation without give and take. So I think in the long run, there will be a compromise.”

Associated Press writer Matthew Pennington in Washington contributed to this report.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

From Our Blogs


The latest from PT365

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.

This Week's Army Times

This Week's Army Times

CrossFit vs. unit PT
Troops will do the training plans in a $2.5 million study

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook