Advertisement

You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Missile defense team quietly comes, goes at Ethan Allen site

Oct. 23, 2013 - 06:30PM   |  
  • Filed Under

WASHINGTON — With little fanfare, a Missile Defense Agency team slipped in and out of Camp Ethan Allen last week to research the feasibility of locating a possible missile defense battery at the site.

The Jericho, Vt., facility, known as the Ethan Allen Firing Range, is one of five sites being considered as part of a congressional mandate, although agency officials say they don’t need an additional site.

The agency will select at least three sites by the end of this year for a formal environmental impact study that will take up to two years to complete.

“Remember, there is no decision to build an additional missile defense site,” Richard Lehner, a Missile Defense Agency spokesman, wrote in an email.

The five-person agency team from Huntsville, Ala., spent Oct. 17 — the day the federal government reopened after a partial shutdown — at the Jericho facility, gathering information on land-parcel size, water resources, electrical power suitability and transportation access, Lehner wrote.

Lehner said the agency will also rely on a large amount of data that had been previously collected and published.

“The purpose of the visit was to collect and/or confirm data to use in the upcoming formal assessment process,” he wrote.

The Missile Defense Agency says the Pentagon’s current missile defense sites at Fort Greely, Alaska, and Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif., are enough to protect the U.S. from a limited intercontinental ballistic missile attack. But recent defense legislation requires the Pentagon to study additional sites that might be suitable to protect the U.S. against threats from nations such as North Korea and Iran.

Neither country has missiles that could reach the United States, although they’ve been working on it for years.

Vermont’s congressional delegation and Gov. Peter Shumlin oppose a missile defense battery in the state.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., the most senior member of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense, said in September he was “emphatically” against basing such a site in Vermont, calling the billions spent on missile defense a “monumental waste of money on technologically challenged systems.”

The other four possible sites for the Ground-based Midcourse Interceptor are the Camp Ravenna Joint Military Training Center in Ohio, the NAS Portsmouth SERE Training Area in Maine, the Fort Custer CTC in Michigan and Fort Drum in New York.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan
Rates

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.


This Week's Army Times

This Week's Army Times

Many missions, fewer soldiers
Army chief talks new deployments; 'grave' readiness concern

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

Classifieds
MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.
Woman who cried rape
(3 replies)
   Last Post: TJMAC77SP
        May 3, 2014 1:32 PM
   Last Post: garhkal
        May 1, 2014 5:03 PM
Cliven Bundy
(45 replies)
   Last Post: Chief_KO
        Apr 26, 2014 9:49 AM
Handbooks

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook