You will be redirected to the page you want to view in  seconds.

Marines say raid on law offices did not taint cases

May. 22, 2014 - 08:42PM   |  
  • Filed Under

CAMP PENDLETON, CALIF. — An initial Marine Corps review into a raid by military investigators on defense lawyers’ offices earlier this month has found no evidence that the unusual search compromised cases.

The findings of the May 2 search were revealed Thursday during a motions hearing for Lance Cpl. Eric Salinas, a defendant in a hazing case who is being represented by defense lawyers in the Camp Pendleton offices.

Military investigators searching for a cellphone in a separate case involving drug use and gang activity searched all of the defense attorneys’ offices.

Defense lawyers have spoken out against the search, saying it overstepped bounds, may have tainted scores of cases and compromised their client-attorney relationships. They compared it to a raid by the FBI on public defenders’ offices.

Salinas wants to sever his relationship with his Camp Pendleton defense lawyers and wants to be assigned representation outside the base.

His defense lawyers told the judge he cannot get a fair trial because he has no guarantee investigators did not see privileged material between him and his attorneys when they searched every defense counsel’s office. They said the raid’s impact is far reaching, and clients such as Salinas prove that.

“I can’t give assurances to my clients that my offices won’t be searched in light of what happened here,” Capt. Gregg Curley said.

The review found no evidence to support defense attorneys’ claims, but an investigation by a higher ranking officer has not concluded. In the meantime, defense lawyers asked Judge Lt. Col. Elizabeth Harvey to weigh in on the issue.

If she rules the search compromised Salinas’ case in any way, it could set a precedent for other cases. The Camp Pendleton offices have about 70 cases, including an Iraq war crimes case.

The Marine Corps appointed what it said was a neutral, independent judge advocate to review the seized evidence to identify whether any potential privileged material was improperly disclosed. The review also looked at how the search was conducted.

Military investigator Sgt. Lisa Brandt testified Thursday that the review found no attorney-client privileged information was compromised.

“We didn’t read any text or anything,” she told the judge. “When you’re searching, you’re not savvy enough to read something. You’re shuffling papers.”

She added that the aim was to find the phone and verify that it was the right cellphone before leaving.

The judge did not indicate when she would rule on the Salinas case but said it would be soon.

Answers by RallyPoint

Join trending discussions in the military's #1 professional community. See what members like yourself have to say from across the DoD.

More In News

Start your day with a roundup of top defense news.

VA Home Loan

Search By:

Product Options:
Zip Code:

From Our Blogs


The latest from PT365

News for your in-box

Sign up now for free Military Times E-Reports. Choose from Money and Education. Subscribers: log in for premium e-newsletters.

This Week's Army Times

This Week's Army Times

CrossFit vs. unit PT
Troops will do the training plans in a $2.5 million study

Subscribe for Print or Digital delivery today!

MilitaryTimes Green Trusted Classifieds Looking to buy, sell and connect on Military Times?
Browse expanded listings across hundreds of military installations.
Faces of valorHonoring those who fought and died in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedom.
hall of valorThe Hall of Valor is a searchable database of valor award citations collected by Doug Sterner, a Vietnam veteran and Military Times contributing editor, and by Military Times staff.

All you need to know about your military benefits.

Benefits handbook

Guard & Reserve All you need to know about the Guard & Reserve.

guard and reserve handbook