PDA

View Full Version : Navy adds rotary-wing squadrons, sailors



CommunityEditor
01-26-2009, 08:27 PM
The Navy is expanding and streamlining the helicopter fleet, offering young rotary-wing aviators more career flexibility in the coming years.

The Navy has added three rotary-wing squadrons during the past several years, and plans to stand up seven more by 2019, Navy officials said.

Today’s fleet of 7,700 enlisted sailors will grow to about 9,100 in the next 10 years, and the number of officers is slated to rise to 1,775, up from today’s level of about 1,400, Navy officials said.

“There will be a lot more command opportunities for people to get promoted. And that will follow on the enlisted side — the opportunity to make chief will increase,” said Cmdr. Michael Stoll, the helicopter readiness officer for Naval Air Forces.

At the same time, the Navy is scaling back the number of helicopter types in the fleet, dropping from seven models to just two: the MH-60R and the MH-60S.

Those two aircraft will be taking on more missions than before, including anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare and mine sweeping.

For helicopter pilots, the new configuration will allow more variety because fewer platforms will be doing more missions.

“The junior pilots will get to fly more in different environments,” said Cmdr. Michael Nortier, commanding officer of Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71. “Now you’ll have an opportunity to move back and forth between expeditionary and air wing squadrons.”

More squadrons — especially concentrated in the areas of San Diego; Norfolk, Va.; and Jacksonville, Fla. — will also mean more options for enlisted sailors to settle down, buy a house and keep their kids in the same schools.

“It’s going to allow folks to stay in one place as they do their sea-shore rotation,” said Cmdr. Michael Ruth, commanding officer of Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 8.

Many of the new rotary-wing slots are getting filled with aviators moving over from the S-3 Viking community, which just had a squadron complete the community’s final deployment.


Article: http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/01/navy_helos_012609w/

PAMICH
01-30-2009, 10:33 AM
I applaud the Navy for increasing helo squads. As many of the Helo squads decommed over the years, or transistioned to other platforms, many Sailors lost their place in the Navy. It seemed the Navy lost focus on the importance of these aircrafts . Hopefully our destroyer fleet along with other platforms are increased or improved to accomodate the usefulness of Helos. Homesteading in a geographical area is another fine idea. I know nothing new in the aviation community. The foundation of homesteading, giving families and children a stable home can only be positive. Not to mention $$ saving on PCS. Now I am a firm believer that Sailors belong on ships and ships belong at sea, and we still need a place to berth and call home.

CUSEFAN21
01-31-2009, 06:38 PM
Well that will surely help out keep many in at a time when the navy needs to grow not make cuts!!!! Bring back frigates, destroyers and the like sitting in storage rusting away

MexDoc
02-12-2009, 06:12 AM
lets get some of these puppies out in afghanistan....i had to wait over an hour to get medevac'd when i got blown up do to only 2 army medevac helo's in our AO

hcshawk
02-14-2009, 02:24 AM
Minesweeping? The MH-60S couldn't tow the sled the Navy designed for it. Hence the reason the MH-53E is still with HM-14/15. Navy still hasn't figured that one out yet. Matter of fact, HM squadrons are getting MORE MH-53 aircraft (from HC-4), are in high demand for the amount of cargo they can carry.

The SH-60B was already doing ASW, so they just replaced it with the R. Nothing new there.

The HH-60H has proven its' worth over both Afghanistan and Iraq. Over such large territories, you NEED legs. Success of the Hotel is largely attributed to the fact that it can fly almost 5 hours without refueling, and still carry both weapons and troops. When Army and Air Force Blackhawk brethern are hitting the tank two or three times, Seahawks have been able to stay in the fight, and keep constant coverage over target areas. The B/F/H series can carry almost 2000 pounds more gas (ie, 2.5 hours more flight time) than the Sierra. The MH-60S is a great bird, but the lack of legs will limit what it can accomplish.

While the "Master Plan" calls for only two helicopters, don't plan on the MH-53 or HH-60H going anywhere for years to come.

hcshawk
02-14-2009, 02:31 AM
lets get some of these puppies out in afghanistan....i had to wait over an hour to get medevac'd when i got blown up do to only 2 army medevac helo's in our AO

Take that fight to Navy brass, and they'll relent. They feel Navy birds should serve Navy needs (read: bluewater). Army, Air Force and Marines all fight overland battles. There has been considerable resistance at the top to supporting any sort of overland Navy rotary operations.