Military Forums - Military Times


Go Back   MilitaryTimes.com Forums > Military Service > Navy > Navy Archives: 2005 - 2008
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 
Bookmark and Share
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-26-2008, 11:10 AM
CommunityEditor CommunityEditor is offline
MilitaryTimes.com Community Editor
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,433
Default InSurv: LPD 18’s fighting ability ‘degraded’

Just under two years after the amphibious transport dock New Orleans was delivered incomplete, the amphib still can’t perform the central mission for which it was designed: Carrying Marines, their gear and their vehicles into battle, according to a recent report by the Navy’s Board of Inspection and Survey, or InSurv.

The San Diego-based New Orleans was “degraded” in its “ability to conduct sustained combat operations,” and has a slew of other problems, according to the inspection, conducted Aug. 11-15. The report, obtained by Navy Times, paints the picture of a ship not only troubled by the same technical problems as its older sibling, the first-in-class gator San Antonio, but also with many of its own.

“The ship cannot support embarked troops, cargo or landing craft,” the report said. Navy engineers found “serious materials deficiencies in the well deck and vehicle stowage areas”; the well deck’s ventilation fans didn’t work; the vehicle ramps were inoperative; and berthing for Marines and the ships’ crew was found to be unsatisfactory.

Moreover, the ship’s propulsion system was unreliable, causing a 10-hour delay before it could put to sea for its final contract trials. Much of its communications equipment didn’t work. And when the ship tried to test its Rolling Airframe Missile launchers, both of them fired just one missile at their targets and then lost power, forcing crews to reset their computer systems.

The New Orleans InSurv arrived just as the Norfolk, Va.-based San Antonio is preparing to make its maiden deployment this week. That ship was delivered three years ago, also incomplete. Like the San Antonio, the New Orleans’ electrical system had ship-wide problems, according to Navy inspectors: “Significant electrical and electronic cable plant installation deficiencies exist,” Navy inspectors wrote, including “dead-ended cables, cables improperly bundled and banded, cables exceeding nesting capacity, inadequate packing of cables at watertight penetrations.”

The findings make for a total of three ships with widespread electrical problems that were built at Northrop Grumman’s shipyards along the Gulf Coast: the first two San Antonios and the amphibious assault ship Makin Island. Northrop Grumman announced earlier this year that it had to delay the delivery of the Makin Island by six months to fix its wiring problems. The company agreed to bear the roughly $360 million cost.

Spokespeople for the Navy and Northrop Grumman had no comment Monday.



Article: http://www.militarytimes.com/news/20...blems_082508w/
  #2  
Old 08-27-2008, 01:22 PM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Unhappy Re: InSurv: LPD 18’s fighting ability ‘degraded’

They should be fire and turn over with a new and more experienced company.
  #3  
Old 08-27-2008, 04:52 PM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: InSurv: LPD 18’s fighting ability ‘degraded’

The skill set of the labor force is third world at best. Most yard employee are under/untrained and woefully underpaid. If you build it in these yards, you sure don't want your sons and daughters sailing or deploying on them. Criminally shoddy work by connected corporate thugawumps. Just drive by the yards where they build these things-they look like beach side Hatian Fishing Boat repair yards.
  #4  
Old 08-27-2008, 06:34 PM
reply
 
Posts: n/a
Smile Re: InSurv: LPD 18’s fighting ability ‘degraded’

do you two work for GD or for LM?
  #5  
Old 08-27-2008, 08:21 PM
Unregistered
 
Posts: n/a
Thumbs down Re: InSurv: LPD 18’s fighting ability ‘degraded’

"More with less" and untried technology combine to create a stituation which requires time to recover from. Transfering computer designs to a work force which continues to be trapped in an efficiency process woefully behind technological standards is NOT what the taxpayers are "hoping" to fund.
 


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2009 Army Times Publishing Company