Army says new earplugs will save your hearing

[CommunityEditor]

Damaged ear drums and other hearing loss ailments top the list of complaints at the Ear, Nose and Throat walk-in clinics at Bagram Airfield in Afghanistan, pointing to a preference by troops to reject the use of ear protection, according to medical personnel.

Though troops are issued ear protection and many units require troops to use it, more than half the patients seen at the ENT clinics are there for hearing-related issues, said an Army news release.

“The first question I ask a patient who comes in with a hearing complaint is ‘Were you wearing hearing protection?’” Air Force Col. (Dr.) Joseph Brennan said in the release. “Since I arrived here in May, I have not had one service member answer ‘yes’ to that question.”

Many troops say they don’t use hearing protection on missions because they feel it affects their situational awareness, ability to do their jobs and complete their missions, he said.

“I was in Iraq in ‘04 and ‘05 — in Fallujah with the Marines and the Army’s 1st Infantry Division — and we just couldn’t get folks to wear their hearing protection,” Brennan said. “We understand. It is like the old Army helmets — soldiers were complaining they couldn’t shoot with them. So even though they offered better protection, which as a doctor is what I care about, the fight is most important.”

While in Iraq, Brennan said, he saw more than 600 outpatients in an ENT clinic, and hearing loss was the top diagnosis there, just as it is today in Afghanistan.

Loud noises such as those from improvised explosive devices — the top cause for hearing loss in Iraq and Afghanistan – can cause conductive hearing loss, sensory neuro hearing loss or tinnitus, Brennan said.

The most common problem, Brennan said, is a blown-out ear drum, which is considered a conductive form of hearing loss.

This means that sound is not reaching the nerve in the ear that allows people to hear, Brennan explained, adding that it can heal on its own.

He recalled an incident in Iraq in 2004 in which a soldier had been through two roadside bomb blasts.

“The second explosion really blew out his ear drums, and he could not hear a thing. The soldier’s sergeant and his fellow soldiers were on a rooftop in a firefight. The bullets were buzzing by his head. His sergeant had to tackle him to get him out of the line of fire, because the soldier could not hear his comrades yelling for him to take cover.”

Brennan urged troops to get used to wearing ear protection for their own safety and the safety of their fellow troops. And, he cautioned, hearing loss can lead to medical discharge or reclassification to another military occupational specialty.

There is a easy solution to this, the army just needs to actually care about the soldiers hearing and not about checking a block.

Issue hearing pro like MSA Supreme pro, products like this offer optimum protection of damaging sound with high amplification of normal tones like speaking. It all comes down to the all mighty dollar and what our leaders at the highest echelon think we are worth.

[ramrod]

I didn't know there was competition out there for hearing protection for the Army. The combat earplug works just fine.

Would you rather treat them for hearing loss, or loss of body parts?

Originally Posted by c0b2a

There is a easy solution to this, the army just needs to actually care about the soldiers hearing and not about checking a block.

Issue hearing pro like MSA Supreme pro, products like this offer optimum protection of damaging sound with high amplification of normal tones like speaking. It all comes down to the all mighty dollar and what our leaders at the highest echelon think we are worth.

Agreed, if a Soldier's job is to shoot, move, and communicate simultaneously, there's no reason not to make high quality electronic hearing protection the standard issue.

[ramrod]

Originally Posted by Unregistered2

Would you rather treat them for hearing loss, or loss of body parts?

I have never heard anyone complain about ear protection. Ever! I have never heard, or seen, anyone get hurt or die from not having the best hearing protection. It's either they wear it or they don't.

[SEABEEINDC]

I wrote a point paper on this very thing, trying to plead my case for issuance of MSA Sordins. They do work!

I was an aerial gunner during WWII. I was operating two .50 calibers and there was never a mention about ear protection. I was also a radopman taking code, occasionally, and when I was discharged, I complained of the ringing in my ears. They dismissed my complaints and, truthfully, I thought I was still hearing one long code - as when you hold the key down. Pretty dumb, right. Of course, I was a kid who enlisted under-age. Not the smartest thing I've ever done.

Originally Posted by ramrod

I have never heard anyone complain about ear protection. Ever! I have never heard, or seen, anyone get hurt or die from not having the best hearing protection. It's either they wear it or they don't.

sigh...

If you havent heard anyone complain about wearing ear protection on patrol, you havent been listening.
The point was, guys dont wear ear pro because they feel it restricts hearing and situational awareness.

[alvarezjc]

I haven't "heard" anyone complain about hearing protection. As a matter of fact, I haven't heard much of anything since my return from Iraq. Would someone answer the phone!!!