PDA

View Full Version : DoD approves more accompanied tours in Korea


CommunityEditor
12-10-2008, 06:54 PM
Reasoning that North Korea now poses no more of a likely threat to the South than the former Soviet Union did to Western Europe in the Cold War, the Pentagon has decided to dramatically increase the number of duty tours in South Korea that include family members, and lengthen such tours from two to three years in all but two authorized areas.

Married troops also will be able to bring spouses and children along for two-year command-sponsored tours in Uijongbu and Dongducheon, cities that lie between Seoul and the Demilitarized Zone that divides the two nations.

Standard unaccompanied tours of 12 months would remain unchanged for single troops.

Married service members, however, will have a choice — bring their families on a two-year accompanied tour, or go it alone for 12 months.

The changes, signed Dec. 1 by Pentagon personnel chief David S.C. Chu and made public Wednesday, are subject to the adequacy of infrastructure, services and base support in each location.

The number of command sponsorship vacancies at each of seven locations will be jointly determined by Gen. Walter Sharp, commander of U.S. Forces Korea, and senior theater service representatives.

In the long term, U.S. officials plan to build more family support infrastructure, with financial aid from South Korea, as U.S. forces continue to consolidate and move south from camps established in the Korean War. The moves are part of a phased shift of primary military responsibility on the peninsula to the South Korean military, an effort slated for completion in 2012.

The first of the newly approved accompanied tours could begin this spring, said Bill Carr, deputy undersecretary of defense for military personnel policy.

The services’ implementation plans are due back to Chu by March 1, after which officials will set an implementation date.

Officials acknowledge that North Korea, which has exploded a nuclear device and claims it has developed nuclear warheads for missiles, remains the primary threat to security in Northeast Asia. And while Sharp argues that the U.S.-South Korea alliance would quickly defeat a North Korean assault, he says that such an attack “would cause huge damage.”

Yet while assignments to South Korea continue to be made “as though this remained an active combat zone, conflict is not imminent,” Gen. B.B. Bell, Sharp’s predecessor, told the House Armed Services Committee in March in arguing for a change in assignment policy.

Troops brought their families to Germany during the Cold War, which Bell said “created a stable military and sent a strong message of U.S. commitment and reliability to European allies.”

Allowing more families to live in South Korea with full U.S. support similarly “would send a powerful message to the nations of the area of America’s long-term commitment to security and stability in Northeast Asia.”

A change will also save money on the cost of more frequent relocations, he said.

USFK hopes to eventually build enough infrastructure, including more U.S. schools, to fully support its roughly 28,500 service members in country, with the expectation that at least 80 percent with families will opt for accompanied tours, according to Army Col. Jane Crichton, a USFK spokeswoman.

As of Dec. 4, there were 2,135 command-sponsored families living in South Korea. Such tours have always been limited, parsed out to selected billets in various locations, Crichton said.

Only three service members assigned north of Seoul in what are termed “key billets” are on accompanied tours; their spouses live in Seoul, Crichton said.

Another 1,909 non-command-sponsored U.S. families live in South Korea — families that have chosen the expense and, in many areas, lack of available U.S. facilities, over being separated from their service member for 12 months or longer.

This fall, in an initiative launched by Bell and overseen by Sharp, officials began to provide support for unaccompanied families in the Camp Red Cloud area in Uijongbu, granting limited housing allowances, a without-dependents cost-of-living allowance and Tricare Standard medical coverage.

Under the new policy, Pyeongtaek, Osan, Daegu, Chinhae and Seoul will transition from 24-month to 36-month accompanied tours. Uijongbu and Dongducheon, which currently offer no standard accompanied tours, will begin offering 24-month accompanied tours.

The shorter tours are an acknowledgement that the latter two areas do not offer the same level of U.S. services as Seoul and areas further south, Carr said.

If all goes as planned, married troops who come down on orders to South Korea will be directed to a secure Web site where they can review the facilities available at their future duty station and then choose a tour length, Carr said.

Officials also will gauge service members’ interest in serving shorter accompanied tours. Carr expects that the services will develop polls that will ask, after a service member decides to serve 12 months unaccompanied or 36 months accompanied in most locations, if their decision would have been different had they been offered a 24-month accompanied option.


Article: http://www.militarytimes.com/news/2008/12/military_korea_assignments_121008w/

Tursk
12-11-2008, 09:51 PM
If the military strategists of the USA have determined that North Korea does not pose a threat to the south then the proper move for the U.S, Military is to further decrease it's foot print in the ROK. The USA is strapped for money and resources like few times in it's history. There will be a lot of added expense required for the care and billeting of more family members in the ROK. True, on 12 month tours there has always been a problem with fluctuating experience levels etc,... In today's world with the war against terror becoming the first and foremost national security priority it makes absolutley no logistical or military sense to increase the foot print of non combatants in a country because the threat there is reduced. A clear thinking general who is not bowing to populist pressure within the ranks but, is thinking clearly about the best interests of the country should see this. If the decision of our military strategists is in fact reduced threat then,,,reduced threat must equate to reduced footprint and not an increase in the military dependent footprint.

10Man
02-16-2009, 04:03 PM
Yeah,
I agree with you 100%. I see this as a way to do two things, make this assignment more desireable plus create a longer tour of duty. We aren't leaving Korea anytime soon, even if the North poses less of a threat now than it did 10 years ago. JMO.

Speedy52
02-20-2009, 11:13 AM
I dont know if this is going to be a good enough incentive for people to want to go to Korea. I know few who would jump at the chance to go for an accompanied tour. But for mil-mil it might just be better for one member to go and then PCS to another location. I dont think i would do this, unless my husband is willing to do another year in Korea. And on top of that, I know i wouldnt do this if we had children. Sounds good in theory if your not joint spouse.